MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Planar WGM Resonator with High Dielectric-Constant Ceramic Slab for Sensing Applications

2021· article· en· W4211014869 on OpenAlexaff
Afsaneh Hojjati Firoozabadi, Ala Eldin Omer, Suren Gigoyan, Safieddin Safavi‐Naeini

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonatorPlanarPermittivityDielectricMaterials scienceSlabCeramicRelative permittivityQ factorWhispering-gallery waveMicrowaveDielectric resonatorOptoelectronicsQuality (philosophy)OpticsPhysicsComposite materialTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a ceramic slab with high dielectric constant (&#x03B5;<inf>r</inf> &#x003D; 60) is incorporated in a printed ring resonator to realize a planar and compact sensing structure that supports higher order whispering gallery modes (WGMs) at microwave frequency band of 16 to 26 GHz. As the slab relative-permittivity increases, the resonator effective permittivity increases, and thereby higher order WGMs of high-quality factor are induced in the operating frequency band of the structure. Some electromagnetic features of the proposed structure are discussed to show its potential for many sensing applications including the characterization of aqueous solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcoustic Wave Resonator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207