Anatomical connectivity profile development constrains medial-lateral topography in the dorsal prefrontal cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is a highly variable, evolutionarily expanded brain region that is engaged in multiple cognitive processes. The subregions of the PFC mature relatively late compared with other brain regions, and the maturation times vary between these subregions. Among these, the dorsomedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dmPFC and dlPFC) share a parallel topographic pattern of functional connectivity, while participating in different types of complex behaviors. However, the developmental trajectories of the two areas remain obscure. In this study, we uncovered differences in the developmental trends of the dmPFC and dlPFC. These differences were mainly caused by structural and functional changes in the medial area of the superior frontal gyrus (SFG). The developmentally different arealization patterns were verified using multiple parcellation approaches with multimodal data, including structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), diffusion MRI (dMRI), resting state functional MRI (rfMRI), and a publicly available transcriptomic dataset. Human brain gene expression data was also used to perform downstream analyses, which could inform us about the potential biological mechanisms underlying the developmentally different arealizations. Furthermore, behavioral analyses hinted at the effects of regionalization on ontogeny. In brief, this study revealed a tendency toward a medial-lateral prefrontal division and can provide a fuller understanding of the potential underlying genetic underpinnings as well as of the potential effects on developmental behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".