MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preparation «Karipain Scar» in a pediatric combustion unit

2021· article· en· W4211026876 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. V. Salisty, G. Z. Saidgalin, Vadim S. Biktashev, Arsen A. Faizyanov, I. G. Prikhodko, A. A. Emelyanov, M. V. Makhotina

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Pediatric Surgery · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatologic Treatments and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScarsMedicineSurgeryProteolytic enzymesDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. The existing problem of post-burn scar treatment is associated with diffculties in delivering enzyme preparations through the cicatricial tissue; so, it is stimulating searches for the preparations with proteolytic and anti-inflammatory effects which could penetrate deep into scar thickness. Such a preparation is the gel "Karipain Scar" (manufacturer LLC "Scientifc and production company "AS-COM", Moscow, Russian Federation), containing proteolytic enzymes and a transcutaneous conductor – titanium glycerosolvate aquacomplex in the form of a gel (trade name Tizol®, LLC "Society for Laboratory Research of Medicines", Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation). The article describes administration of this preparation in a pediatric combustion unit to treat post-burn pathological scars, including old scars , by applying the drug on scars and by electrodragging.Material and methods. The described technique is used one month after the wound healing. At the frst stage of the study, Karipain Scar was applied on the scar area twice a day to the patients of experimental group (20 children aged 4-16 years with scars on limbs, torso, and large joints). At the second stage, Karipain Scar gel was applied to 18 patients aged 4-16 with scars on limbs, torso, and joints using electrodragging. The scars were photographed once a week and assessed by the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS).Results. At the frst stage , all participants of the experimental group reported less itching until its complete disappearance by the end of the second week and the decrease of scar height at the beginning of the second month of treatment. The scars turned pale by the end of the 2nd month. At the second stage, 100% of patients from the experimental group reported the improvement in scars since the 5th procedure. There was no signifcant difference between fresh and old scars. Karipain Scar gel was well-tolerated. There were no allergic reactions and complications.Conclusion. The conducted studies has confrmed the effectiveness of Karipain Scar gel for treating children with post-burn scars

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of Pediatric SurgerySame topicDermatologic Treatments and ResearchFrench-language works237,207