Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Northern Mariner / Le marin du nord, XXIX, No. 4 (Winter 2019), 313-334 "A Marine Nondescript" Canada's First Icebreaker H.T. Holman Le Canada étant une nation nordique, son patrimoine marin a été grandement influencé par les glaces saisonnières qui ont limité l'exploration, la colonisation et le développement du commerce.Si le Canada allait faire amplement appel à des brise-glaces au vingtième siècle, il est étonnant de constater qu'il y avait eu peu de progrès dans ce domaine au cours des années précédentes.Parmi les exceptions, notons le développement dans les années 1870 du Northern Light, un navire à caractère inhabituel qui présentait de nouvelles approches et une conception novatrice.Malheureusement, ces progrès ont été mal appliqués et le manque de succès a fait en sorte que la conception expérimentale a été ignorée ou abandonnée.Cet article examine le début prometteur et la fin peu glorieuse de ce brise-glace innovateur. 1 The Island's history during the last quarter of the nineteenth century has been the subject of relatively little study.Frank MacKinnon's The Government of Prince Edward Island (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1951) still stands out although it is limited to political history.Communications are covered but briefly in Judith Fingard's chapter "The 1880s: Paradoxes of Progress" in E.R. Forbes and D.A. Muise eds.The Atlantic Provinces in Confederation (Fredericton: Acadiensis Press, 1993).One of the few studies which examines interprovincial communications in any detail is Mary K. Cullen, "The Transportation Issue 1873-1973 " in Francis W.P. Bolger, ed., Canada's Smallest Province: A History of P.E.I. ([Charlottetown]: Prince Edward Island 1973 Centennial Commission, 1973), 232-44.The Northern Light is noted in the context of government marine operations in Thomas G. Appleton's Usque Ad Mare A History of the Canadian Coast Guard and Marine Services (Ottawa: Department of Transport, Queen's Printer, 1968), 53-59.Cross-Strait communication also was a consideration
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".