MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211032707 · doi:10.1111/jpy.13243

A DINOFLAGELLATE TBP‐LIKE FACTOR ACTIVATES TRANSCRIPTION FROM A TTTT‐BOX IN YEAST

2022· article· en· W4211032707 on OpenAlexaff
Bahareh Zaheri, Charlotte Veilleux‐Trinh, David Morse

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Phycology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtist diversity and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscription factor II DTranscription factor II ABiologyTAF4TATA boxTAF2TATA-binding proteinTATA-Box Binding ProteinTranscription factorTAF1YeastGeneral transcription factorCell biologyGeneticsPromoterMolecular biologyGeneDNA-binding proteinGene expressionEnhancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dinoflagellates do not have a typical TATA-binding protein (TBP), a subunit of the general transcription factor TFIID complex. Instead, they have a TBP-like factor (TLF) that has been shown to bind TTTT instead of TATA in vitro. The ability of TLF to act as a functional replacement of TBP in vivo has never been assessed, however. Here, we show that a dinoflagellate TLF can drive expression of a reporter gene controlled by a budding yeast promoter whose TATA box was mutated to TTTT. TLF is thus able to bind and activate the yeast RNA polymerase and appear to function normally in the TFIID complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PhycologySame topicProtist diversity and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207