Interventions to prevent hypothermia at birth in preterm and/or low birthweight babies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE The primary objective will be to assess the efficacy and safety of interventions, designed for the prevention of hypothermia in preterm and/or low birthweight infants, and applied within 10 minutes after birth in delivery suite, compared with routine thermal care. Sub‐group analyses will be carried out by intervention, by birthweight/gestational age and by developmental status of the country of study, to determine whether effectiveness varies according to: The interventions applied Birthweight and gestational age within the following categories: birthweight (<1500g), (1500g to 2500g) gestational age (<28wk), (28 to 32wk) and (33 to 37wk) The developmental status of the country in which the trial has been conducted based upon the UNICEF classification of a developing country (UNICEF 2002). SECONDARY OBJECTIVE The secondary objective will be to assess complications associated with prematurity and hypothermia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.055 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.013 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.055 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".