MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211051726 · doi:10.1101/2022.02.09.22270547

Cov <sup>2</sup> MS: an automated matrix-independent assay for mass spectrometric detection and measurement of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in infectious patients

2022· preprint· en· W4211051726 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bart Van Puyvelde, Katleen Van Uytfanghe, Laurence Van Oudenhove, Ralf Gabriels, Tessa Van Royen, Arne Matthys, Morteza Razavi, Richard Yip, Terry W. Pearson, Marijn Van Hulle, Jan Claereboudt, Kevin D. Wyndham, Don Jones, Xavier Saelens, Geert A. Martens, Christophe P. Stove, Dieter Deforce, Lennart Martens, Johannes P.C. Vissers, N. Leigh Anderson, Maarten Dhaenens

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionVlaamse regeringHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsChromatographyPeptideChemistryMass spectrometrySample preparationImmunoassaySalivaDetection limitSelected reaction monitoringVirologyAntibodyBiologyTandem mass spectrometryBiochemistryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION The pandemic readiness toolbox needs to be extended, providing diagnostic tools that target different biomolecules, using orthogonal experimental setups and fit-for-purpose specification of detection. Here we build on a previous Cov-MS effort that used liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and describe a method that allows accurate, high throughput measurement of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein. MATERIALS and METHODS We used Stable Isotope Standards and Capture by Anti-Peptide Antibodies (SISCAPA) technology to enrich and quantify proteotypic peptides of the N protein from trypsin-digested samples from COVID-19 patients. RESULTS The Cov 2 MS assay was shown to be compatible with a variety of sample matrices including nasopharyngeal swabs, saliva and blood plasma and increased the sensitivity into the attomole range, up to a 1000-fold increase compared to direct detection in matrix. In addition, a strong positive correlation was observed between the SISCAPA antigen assay and qPCR detection beyond a quantification cycle (Cq) of 30-31, the level where no live virus can be cultured from patients. The automatable “addition only” sample preparation, digestion protocol, peptide enrichment and subsequent reduced dependency upon LC allow analysis of up to 500 samples per day per MS instrument. Importantly, peptide enrichment allowed detection of N protein in a pooled sample containing a single PCR positive sample mixed with 31 PCR negative samples, without loss in sensitivity. MS can easily be multiplexed and we also propose target peptides for Influenza A and B virus detection. CONCLUSIONS The Cov 2 MS assay described is agnostic with respect to the sample matrix or pooling strategy used for increasing throughput and can be easily multiplexed. Additionally, the assay eliminates interferences due to protein-protein interactions including those caused by anti-virus antibodies. The assay can be adapted to test for many different pathogens and could provide a tool enabling longitudinal epidemiological monitoring of large numbers of pathogens within a population, applied as an early warning system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingFrench-language works237,207