Atrial Fibrillation and Anterior Cerebral Artery Absence Reduce Cerebral Perfusion: A De Novo Hemodynamic Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia and may reduce cerebral blood perfusion augmenting the risk of dementia. We hypothesize that geometric variations in the cerebral arterial structure called the Circle of Willis (CoW) play an important role in influencing cerebral perfusion. The objective of this work was to develop a novel cardio-cerebral lumped parameter hemodynamic model to investigate the role of CoW variants on cerebral blood flow dynamics under atrial fibrillation conditions. Methods: A computational blood flow model was developed by coupling whole-body and detailed cerebral circulation descriptions, modified to represent six common variations of the CoW. Cerebral blood flow dynamics were simulated in common CoW variants, under control and imposed atrial fibrillation conditions. Risk was assessed based on the frequency of beat-wise hypoperfusion events, and sensitivity analysis was performed with respect to this model output. Results: It was found that the geometry of the CoW influenced the frequency of hypoperfusion events at different heart rates, with the variant missing a P1 segment having the highest risk. Sensitivity analysis revealed that intrinsic heart rate is most associated with the considered outcome. Conclusions: Our results suggest that CoW geometry plays an important role in influencing cerebral hemodynamics during atrial fibrillation. The presented study may assist in guiding our future clinical-imaging research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".