Efficiency and relevance of the use of an oxygen-ozone mixture in the complex treatment of acne in men
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to substantiate the relevance of the use of an oxygen-ozone mixture in the complex treatment of acne in men. Materials and methods: The study involved 46 male patients aged 15 to 27 suffering from acne vulgaris of moderate severity. patients from the control group received a standard therapy (systemic antibacterial drugs, benzoyl peroxide and adapalene as external drugs), and patients from the main group received an oxygen-ozone mixture in addition to standard drugs. Clinical evaluation of the intensity of the process was carried out prior to and after the treatment (using the Cook scale), and severity of scarring was assessed by the Vancouver scale; immune status parameters were also assessed. Results: positive clinical dynamics was observed in both groups. normalization of immune status parameters was additionally observed in patients from the main group. Conclusion: the study demonstrated the efficiency of a combined therapy including the introduction of an oxygen-ozone mixture in addition to traditional drugs, so this regimen of treatment can be recommended as a therapy for acne of moderate severity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".