Quantized Tensor Neural Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tensor network as an effective computing framework for efficient processing and analysis of high-dimensional data has been successfully applied in many fields. However, the performance of traditional tensor networks still cannot match the strong fitting ability of neural networks, so some data processing algorithms based on tensor networks cannot achieve the same excellent performance as deep learning models. To further improve the learning ability of tensor network, we propose a quantized tensor neural network in this article (QTNN), which integrates the advantages of neural networks and tensor networks, namely, the powerful learning ability of neural networks and the simplicity of tensor networks. The QTNN model can be further regarded as a generalized multilayer nonlinear tensor network, which can efficiently extract low-dimensional features of the data while maintaining the original structure information. In addition, to more effectively represent the local information of data, we introduce multiple convolution layers in QTNN to extract the local features. We also develop a high-order back-propagation algorithm for training the parameters of QTNN. We conducted classification experiments on multiple representative datasets to further evaluate the performance of proposed models, and the experimental results show that QTNN is simpler and more efficient while compared to the classic deep learning models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".