Stable internal fixation with dual plate technique for osteoporotic distal femur fractures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic distal femur fractures are difficult in terms of fracture treatment and recovery. We hypothesized that the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) with dual plate technique increased fixation stability and encouraged early mobilization and return to pre-fracture activity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2016 and 2019, 22 patients were treated with the dual plate technique for osteoporotic distal femur fractures. To evaluate the clinical outcome, the modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score, Tegner activity score, knee range of motion (ROM), time to pain free full weight bearing from operation and patient satisfaction score were used. To evaluate the radiological outcome, the time to radiological union and varus or valgus angulation were measured. RESULTS: = 0.436). Among 22 patients, 16 patients (72.7%) achieved preoperative activity level. The mean knee ROM was 106.1° ± 16.8° (range, 80-135). The time to pain free weight bearing was 7.4 ± 1.5 (range, 5-10) weeks. In patient satisfaction, 20 patients (90.9%) were very satisfied or somewhat satisfied. Bone union was achieved in all patients at 16.4 ± 4.3 (range, 13-22) weeks. The final follow-up valgus angle was 3.6° ± 4.0° (range, -2.5° - 10.9). CONCLUSION: MIPO with the dual plate technique can provide rigid fixation for osteoporotic distal femur fractures. This stable and rigid fixation may allow early mobilization and return to pre-fracture activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".