MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Corynebacterium</i>

2015· other· en· W4211116098 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorynebacteriumCorynebacterium diphtheriaeCorynebacterium glutamicumBiologyActinobacteriaBacteriaMicrobiologyrpoB16S ribosomal RNADiphtheriaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Co.ry.ne.bac.te'ri.um. Gr. n. coryne a club; L. neut. n. bacterium a rod, and in biology a bacterium (so called because the first ones observed were rod‐shaped); N.L. neut. n. Corynebacterium a club bacterium. Straight to slightly curved rods with tapered ends. Rods are usually short or of medium length. Club‐shaped forms may be observed ; sometimes ellipsoidal, ovoid or rarely, “whip handles” (see below, Corynebacterium matruchotii ) or thinner rods with bulges (see below, Corynebacterium sundsvallense ) observed. Snapping division produces angular and palisade arrangements of cells. Gram‐stain‐positive; some cells stain unevenly . Metachromatic (synonym being polyphosphate) granules may be observed for some species. Not‐acid‐fast (Ziehl–Neelsen stain), and no species has aerial mycelium. Nonsporeforming. All species are nonmotile . All species are catalase positive . All species are oxidase negative except for Corynebacterium bovis, Corynebacterium aurimucosum, Corynebacterium doosanense , and Corynebacterium maris (below). Many species are facultatively anaerobic and some are aerobic . Chemoorganotrophs. Some species are lipophilic. Many species produce acid from glucose and some other sugars in peptone media. Several species alkalinize citrate as sole carbon sources, but most do not. DNA G+C content (mol%) : 46–74. Type species : Corynebacterium diphtheriae (Kruse 1886) Lehmann and Neumann 1896, 350 (“ Bacillus diphtheria ” Kruse in Flügge 1886, 225). Taxonomic and Nomenclature Notes According to the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), the taxonomic status of the genus Corynebacterium is: correct name (last update, February 2025) * . LPSN classification: Bacteria / Bacillati / Actinomycetota / Actinomycetes / Mycobacteriales / Corynebacteriaceae / Corynebacterium The genus Corynebacterium can also be recovered in the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) as g__Corynebacterium (version v220) ** . GTDB classification: d__Bacteria / p__Actinomycetota / c__Actinomycetes / o__Mycobacteriales / f__Mycobacteriaceae / g__Corynebacterium * Meier‐Kolthoff et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D801 – D807 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 ** Parks et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D785 – D794 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab776 </jats

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it