MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211123962 · doi:10.1016/j.nds.2004.05.001

Nuclear Data Sheets for A=149

2004· article· en· W4211123962 on OpenAlexaff
Balraj Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Data Sheets · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomical and nuclear sciences
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYrastPhysicsExcited stateNuclear dataNuclideMass numberAtomic physicsNuclear structureNuclear physicsProtonNeutron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nuclear spectroscopic information for known nuclides of mass number 149 (Cs,Ba,La,Ce,Pr,Nd,Pm,Sm,Eu, Gd,Tb,Dy,Ho,Er,Tm,Yb) with Z=55 to 70 and N=94 to 79 have been evaluated and presented together with adopted energies and Jπof levels in these nuclei. No excited state data are yet available for 149Cs, 149Ba, 149La, 149Tm and 149Yb. The existence of 149Cs is reported from mass separation of products from U(p,X) reaction and that of 149Yb from proton decays of 150Lu g.s. and 150Lu isomer. There are no half-life data for 149Cs and 149Yb. In 149Gd, 12 excited superdeformed bands have been reported, in addition to the yrast (g.s.) superdeformed band. In 149Tb, five superdeformed bands are known, whereas in 149Dy there is some evidence of superdeformation, but no discrete gamma rays have been found. The half-life of fully-ionized 149Dy isomer at 2661 keV has been reported to be 11 s, as compared to 0.49 s for the neutral atom. This evaluation supersedes previous full evaluations of A=149 by Nucl. Data Sheets 46 (1985) 1 and Nucl. Data Sheets 19 (1976) 337 and a midstream (in update mode) evaluation by Nucl. Data Sheets 73 (1994) 351

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5600.435

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Data SheetsSame topicAstronomical and nuclear sciencesFrench-language works237,207