Large-scale functional connectivity predicts cognitive impairment related to type 2 diabetes mellitus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Large-scale functional connectivity (LSFC) patterns in the brain have unique intrinsic characteristics. Abnormal LSFC patterns have been found in patients with dementia, as well as in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and these patterns predicted their cognitive performance. It has been reported that patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may develop MCI that could progress to dementia. We investigated whether we could adopt LSFC patterns as discriminative features to predict the cognitive function of patients with T2DM, using connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) and a support vector machine. AIM: To investigate the utility of LSFC for predicting cognitive impairment related to T2DM more accurately and reliably. METHODS: = 26) of MCI. Brain regions were marked using Harvard Oxford (HOA-112), automated anatomical labeling (AAL-116), and 264-region functional (Power-264) atlases. LSFC biomarkers for predicting MoCA scores were identified using a new CPM technique. Subsequently, we used a support vector machine based on LSFC patterns for among-group differentiation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve determined the appearance of the classification. RESULTS: T2DM-C group) were 0.65-0.70, with LSFC matrices based on HOA-112 and Power-264 atlases having the highest value (0.70). Most discriminative and attractive LSFCs were related to the default mode network, limbic system, and basal ganglia. CONCLUSION: LSFC provides neuroimaging-based information that may be useful in detecting MCI early and accurately in patients with T2DM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".