MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211129876 · doi:10.1109/cns53000.2021.9705050

Context-Aware IoT Device Functionality Extraction from Specifications for Ensuring Consumer Security

2021· article· en· W4211129876 on OpenAlexaff
Upakar Paudel, Andy Dolan, Suryadipta Majumdar, Indrakshi Ray

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAccess Control and Trust
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVendorComputer securityHome automationAccess controlContext (archaeology)NISTSmart deviceConfidentialityInternet of ThingsEmbedded systemTelecommunicationsHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet of Thing (IoT) devices are being widely used in smart homes and organizations. An IoT device has some intended purposes, but may also have hidden functionalities. Typically, the device is installed in a home or an organization and the network traffic associated with the device is captured and analyzed to infer high-level functionality to the extent possible. However, such analysis is dynamic in nature, and requires the installation of the device and access to network data which is often hard to get for privacy and confidentiality reasons. We propose an alternative static approach which can infer the functionality of a device from vendor materials using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. Information about IoT device functionality can be used in various applications, one of which is ensuring security in a smart home. We demonstrate how security policies associated with device functionality in a smart home can be formally represented using the NIST Next Generation Access Control (NGAC) model and automatically analyzed using Alloy, which is a formal verification tool. This will provide assurance to the consumer that these devices will be compliant to the home or organizational policy even before they have been purchased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAccess Control and TrustFrench-language works237,207