Leuprolide Acetate and QTc Interval in Gender-Diverse Youth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Puberty suppression is a standard of care for gender-affirming therapy in gender-diverse youth. Leuprolide acetate is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) commonly used for pubertal suppression. There are concerns that GnRHa agents prolong the rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) when used as androgen deprivation therapy in management of prostate cancer; however, there is a paucity of literature regarding the effect of leuprolide acetate on QTc intervals in gender-diverse youth. Aim: To determine the proportion of gender-diverse youth with QTc prolongation on leuprolide acetate therapy. Methods: A retrospective chart review of gender-diverse youth initiated on leuprolide acetate between July 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019 was conducted at a tertiary care pediatric hospital in Alberta, Canada. Youth aged 9-18 years were included if a 12-lead electrocardiogram was completed after initiating leuprolide acetate. The proportion of adolescents with clinically significant QTc prolongation was assessed, defined as QTc >460 milliseconds (ms). Results: Thirty-three pubertal youth were included. The cohort had a mean age of 13.7 years (standard deviation [SD] 2.1) and 69.7% identified as male (assigned female at birth). The mean post-leuprolide acetate QTc was 415 ms (SD 27, range 372-455). Twenty-two (66.7%) of youth were prescribed concomitant medications, including QTc-prolonging medications in 15.2%. None of the 33 youth on leuprolide acetate had QTc prolongation. Only 24.2% patients had a borderline QTc (QTc 440-460 ms). Conclusion: No gender-diverse youth on leuprolide acetate demonstrated clinically significant QTc prolongation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".