MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211149968 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2022.74

Stationary internal hydraulic jumps

2022· article· en· W4211149968 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsHydraulic jumpStratified flowsMechanicsJumpGeologyTurbulenceStratified flowEntrainment (biomusicology)PhysicsFlow (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a theoretical and laboratory study of stationary internal hydraulic jumps. These jumps are rapid transitions between internally supercritical flow, generated by placing a sill on the bed of a horizontal rectangular channel, and internally subcritical flow, generated by installing a downstream contraction. This contraction generates an approximately uniform flow downstream of the jump; thus mimicking barotropically driven two-layer flows, as found in tidally driven flows over underwater sills, and flows over mountain ranges driven by large-scale pressure gradients. Upstream of the jump a train of Kelvin–Helmholtz billows forms on the interface between the layers. Upper layer fluid is entrained into these billows, which are subsequently advected into the lower portion of the jump. These billows are broken down by the turbulence of the jump, and the entrained upper layer fluid is mixed with lower layer fluid. Downstream of the jump the upper layer remains homogeneous, the density step at the interface is weakened, the upper portion of the lower layer is approximately linearly stratified, and the lower portion of the lower layer is undisturbed. This altered density profile is the downstream conjugate state of the jump. When the contraction is narrowed the jump moves upstream and ‘drowns’ part of the train of billows, reducing the amount of entrainment. Thus, while the jump is responsible for mixing fluid from the upper layer into the lower layer, it is the position of the jump relative to the upstream train of billows that determines the amount of entrainment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it