Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a theoretical and laboratory study of stationary internal hydraulic jumps. These jumps are rapid transitions between internally supercritical flow, generated by placing a sill on the bed of a horizontal rectangular channel, and internally subcritical flow, generated by installing a downstream contraction. This contraction generates an approximately uniform flow downstream of the jump; thus mimicking barotropically driven two-layer flows, as found in tidally driven flows over underwater sills, and flows over mountain ranges driven by large-scale pressure gradients. Upstream of the jump a train of Kelvin–Helmholtz billows forms on the interface between the layers. Upper layer fluid is entrained into these billows, which are subsequently advected into the lower portion of the jump. These billows are broken down by the turbulence of the jump, and the entrained upper layer fluid is mixed with lower layer fluid. Downstream of the jump the upper layer remains homogeneous, the density step at the interface is weakened, the upper portion of the lower layer is approximately linearly stratified, and the lower portion of the lower layer is undisturbed. This altered density profile is the downstream conjugate state of the jump. When the contraction is narrowed the jump moves upstream and ‘drowns’ part of the train of billows, reducing the amount of entrainment. Thus, while the jump is responsible for mixing fluid from the upper layer into the lower layer, it is the position of the jump relative to the upstream train of billows that determines the amount of entrainment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".