Data-driven modeling of time-domain induced polarization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a novel approach for data-driven modeling of the time-domain induced polarization (IP) phenomenon using variational autoencoders (VAE). VAEs are Bayesian neural networks that aim to learn a latent statistical distribution to encode extensive data sets as lower dimension representations. We collected 1 600 319 IP decay curves in various regions of Canada, the United States and Kazakhstan, and compiled them to train a deep VAE. The proposed deep learning approach is strictly unsupervised and data-driven: it does not require manual processing or ground truth labeling of IP data. Moreover, our VAE approach avoids the pitfalls of IP parametrization with the empirical Cole-Cole and Debye decomposition models, simple power-law models, or other sophisticated mechanistic models. We demonstrate four applications of VAEs to model and process IP data: (1) representative synthetic data generation, (2) unsupervised Bayesian denoising and data uncertainty estimation, (3) quantitative evaluation of the signal-to-noise ratio, and (4) automated outlier detection. We also interpret the IP compilation's latent representation and reveal a strong correlation between its first dimension and the average chargeability of IP decays. Finally, we experiment with varying VAE latent space dimensions and demonstrate that a single real-valued scalar parameter contains sufficient information to encode our extensive IP data compilation. This new finding suggests that modeling time-domain IP data using mathematical models governed by more than one free parameter is ambiguous, whereas modeling only the average chargeability is justified. A pre-trained implementation of our model -- readily applicable to new IP data from any geolocation -- is available as open-source Python code for the applied geophysics community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".