MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211175845 · doi:10.21926/aeer.2201005

Urban Air Pollution and Emergency Department Visits for Cardiac and Respiratory Diseases

2022· article· en· W4211175845 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mieczysław Szyszkowicz, Nicholas de Angelis

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Environmental and Engineering Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoisson regressionAir pollutionEmergency departmentEnvironmental healthOzoneNitrogen dioxideMedicineAir quality indexConfidence intervalPollutantCriteria air contaminantsRespiratory systemEnvironmental scienceAir pollutantsMeteorologyGeographyPopulationInternal medicineChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Air pollution affects various aspects of human health. Here, the associations between the number of emergency department visits for circulatory and respiratory problems and ambient air pollution in Toronto, Canada, in the period between April 2004 and December 2015 were studied. The health data were linked with urban air pollution data and weather factors. The conditional Poisson regression models were built for 18 strata (sex, age group, season), 8 exposure factors (air pollutants, indexes), and their 15 lags (0-14 days). Circulatory problems: the associations were intensified in the cold period (October - March) and were associated with the air quality health index (AQHI). The estimated relative risks for all patients in the cold period, for an increase of the AQHI by 1, at lags 0, 1, and 2 were 1.017 and 95% confidence interval (1.010, 1.024), 1.014 (1.007, 1.021), and 1.009 (1.002, 1.016). Respiratory problems: the analogous results for ozone and its increase by 12.8 ppb at lags 3, 4, and 5 were 1.052 (1.033, 1.161), 1.039 (1.020, 1.121), and 1.027 (1.008, 1.082). It was observed that exposure to certain air pollutants (nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and the AQHI index) are associated with increased emergency department visits in both cardiac and respiratory health problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Environmental and Engineering ResearchSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207