Deep learning of quantitative ultrasound multi-parametric images at pre-treatment to predict breast cancer response to chemotherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a novel deep learning-based methodology was investigated to predict breast cancer response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) using the quantitative ultrasound (QUS) multi-parametric imaging at pre-treatment. QUS multi-parametric images of breast tumors were generated using the data acquired from 181 patients diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer and planned for NAC followed by surgery. The ground truth response to NAC was identified for each patient after the surgery using the standard clinical and pathological criteria. Two deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) architectures including the residual network and residual attention network (RAN) were explored for extracting optimal feature maps from the parametric images, with a fully connected network for response prediction. In different experiments, the features maps were derived from the tumor core only, as well as the core and its margin. Evaluation results on an independent test set demonstrate that the developed model with the RAN architecture to extract feature maps from the expanded parametric images of the tumor core and margin had the best performance in response prediction with an accuracy of 88% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86. Ten-year survival analyses indicate statistically significant differences between the survival of the responders and non-responders identified based on the model prediction at pre-treatment and the standard criteria at post-treatment. The results of this study demonstrate the promising capability of DCNNs with attention mechanisms in predicting breast cancer response to NAC prior to the start of treatment using QUS multi-parametric images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".