Neutralization Of SARS-CoV-2 Variants By A Human Polyclonal Antibody Therapeutic (COVID-HIG, NP-028) With High Neutralizing Titers To SARS-CoV-2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Since the start of the COVID-19 outbreak the World Health Organization (WHO) has classified multiple SARS-CoV-2 Variants-of-Concern and Variants-of-Interest (VOC/VOI) with mutations in their Spike protein that increase transmissibility and/or reduce the effectiveness of vaccines and monoclonal antibody therapeutics. The emergence of these variants represents a significant health risk and highlights the need for additional COVID-19 therapeutics that maintain the ability to neutralize current, as well as future variants. COVID-HIG (NP-028) is a polyclonal Anti-SARS-CoV-2 human Immunoglobulin purified from source human plasma screened for high antibody titers to SARS-CoV-2 antigens. COVID-HIG was previously evaluated in INSIGHT 013 clinical trial [ NCT04546581 ] which was an international, multi-center, adaptive, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the safety, tolerability and efficacy of a single dose infusion (up to 400 mL) of Anti-Coronavirus Hyperimmune Intravenous Immunoglobulin (hIVIG) for the treatment of adult recently hospitalized COVID-19 patients (N=593). COVID-HIG is currently being evaluated for clinical efficacy in a Phase 3 placebo-controlled study INSIGHT 012 ( NCT04910269 ) to compare the safety and efficacy of a single infusion of anti-COVID-19 hyperimmune immunoglobulin (hIVIG) versus placebo among adults with recently diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection who do not require hospitalization. In the present study, in-vitro pseudovirus and live virus neutralization assays were used to assess the impact of SARS-CoV-2 variant spike mutations on neutralizing potency of COVID-HIG. These assays are valuable tools for monitoring the potential impact of variant mutations on efficacy of antibody therapeutics as well as vaccines/natural immunity. To date, COVID-HIG (NP-028) has been shown to retain neutralizing potency against 20 full spike protein sequence SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus variants including all currently classified VOC/VOI (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta/Delta+, Eta, Iota, Kappa, Lambda, Mu as of Sept 2021) as well as 4 live virus variants (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Iota).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".