Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The focus of this article is on the synthesis, properties, and applications of metal‐containing polymers. These polymers may be classified based on the types of metal–ligand bonding, and whether the metal is an integral part of the polymer backbone or pendent to the polymer backbone. The first class of polymers discussed are those with metals σ‐bonded to organic spacers in their backbones. Examples of metal–metal single and multiple bonds are also described. Metallocenes and coordination polymers are two classes of polymers where the metal is π‐coordinated to the organic ligands. The coordination of metals to porphyrins, phthalocyanines, Schiff base ligands, as well as to many other types of ligands are described. Another major class of polymers are those where the metal is pendent to the polymer backbone. These polymers include materials with metallic moieties π‐coordinated to unsaturated ligands in their backbones. Polymers with metallic moieties in their side chains are also described. A brief overview of star polymers and dendrimers is also included.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it