MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211224220 · doi:10.3390/su14041965

Analytical Implementation and Prediction of Hydraulic Characteristics for a Francis Turbine Runner Operated at BEP

2022· article· en· W4211224220 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Chen, Jian Zhang, Bryan Karney, Qiang Guo, Jian Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainability · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCavitation Phenomena in Pumps
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsStreamlines, streaklines, and pathlinesFrancis turbineComputational fluid dynamicsTurbineMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Marine engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceSimulationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extensive investigation and profound understanding of the hydraulic characteristics of the Francis turbine are crucial to ensure a safe and stable hydraulic system. Especially, predicting the runner’s hydraulic efficiency with high fidelity is mandatory at the early stage of a new hydropower project. For these purposes, the current technologies mainly include experimentation and CFD simulation. Both methods generally have the demerits of a long period, massive investment and high requirements for supercomputers. In this work, an analytical solution is therefore introduced in order to predict the internal flow field and working performance of the runner while the Francis turbine operates at the best efficiency point (BEP). This approach, based on differential-geometry theory and the kinematics of ideal fluid, discretizes the blade channel by several spatial streamlines. Then, the dynamic parameters of these streamlines are determined in a curved-surface coordinate system, including velocity components, flow angles, Eulerian energy and pressure differences across the blade. Additionally, velocity components are converted from the spatial-velocity triangle to the Cartesian coordinate system, and the absolute-velocity vectors as well as the streamlines are subsequently derived. A validation of this approach is then presented. The analytical solution of hydraulic efficiency shows good agreement with the experimental value and simulation result. Additionally, the distributions of pressure differences over the blade, velocity and Eulerian energy are well predicted with respect to the CFD results. Finally, the discrepancy and distribution of the dynamic parameters are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSustainabilitySame topicCavitation Phenomena in PumpsFrench-language works237,207