MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211227816 · doi:10.2196/36903

PASSION Project: Data Collection in Madagascar and Guinea

2022· article· en· W4211227816 on OpenAlex
Fahafahantsoa Rapelanoro Rabenja

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIproceedings · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatological diseases and infestations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTanzaniaScabiesAtopic dermatitisPopulationFamily medicineDermatologyGeographyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Little data on dermatological conditions presenting on African skin are currently available. This is partly due to the lack of dermatologists in African countries, such as Madagascar and Guinea. There are only 13 dermatologists in Madagascar, or one dermatologist for every 2 million inhabitants. By contrast, the prevalence of common dermatosis is constantly increasing, especially among the pediatric population. According to the World Health Organization, 80% of these skin problems in Africa are grouped into the following 5 pathologies: atopic dermatitis, dermatophytosis, scabies, impetigo, and insect bites. Objective In the face of this dilemma, artificial intelligence (AI) is a better tool to collect data on a national scale. Madagascar began participating in the PASSION project in June 2020 and Guinea began participating in January 2021. They join other countries, like Switzerland, Australia, China, India, and Tanzania, who are also using AI in dermatology. This study mainly aimed to compare the 5 pathologies according to the different phototypes characterizing these countries and to collect cases on a national scale that will form a national database. The aim of the data collection is to add 1000 cases per year to the database. Methods To increase the number of cases included in phototypes III to VI, two countries were included. A total of 6 data collection sites were set up in Madagascar and one was set up in Guinea. Patients were recruited during dermatology consultations. All patients presenting the 5 pathologies were included. A total of 3 platforms were used to collect data: my.crf.one, IntelliStream, and Derma2go. Results A total of 323 cases are currently included in the database for Madagascar, including 76 cases of scabies, 111 cases of atopic dermatitis, 94 cases of dermatophytosis, 35 cases of impetigo and 11 cases of insect bites. The patients’ ages ranged from 2 months to 68 years. A male predominance was noted, with a sex ratio of 1.19 (109 males and 91 females). Phototypes ranged from III to VI. For Guinea, 178 total cases included 32 cases of scabies, 26 cases of atopic dermatitis, 92 cases of dermatophytosis, 3 cases of impetigo, and 25 cases of insect bites. Patients’ ages ranged between 1 year and 70 years, with a male predominance, a sex ratio of 1.54 (108 males and 70 females), and a predominance of phototype VI. Conclusions AI is a data collection solution in Africa. However, high bandwidth is needed to employ AI. Conflicts of Interest None declared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it