MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211249426 · doi:10.1002/mp.15527

Feasibility investigation of logarithmic Nakagami parametric imaging in recovering underestimated perfusion metrics of DCEUS in the uneven acoustic field

2022· article· en· W4211249426 on OpenAlexaff
Diya Wang, Quanlong Ma, Qiao Wang, Shukuan Lu, Qiang Su, Hui Zhong, Mingxi Wan

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaBeijing Medical Award Foundation
KeywordsNakagami distributionLogarithmAmplitudeParametric statisticsAcousticsPhysicsBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceMathematicsComputer scienceOpticsAlgorithmStatisticsDecoding methodsMathematical analysisMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Owing to acoustic-pressure dependence, amplitudes of backscattered-echoes of encapsulated microbubbles (MBs) are unavoidably regulated by an uneven acoustic field, resulting in the misestimation of hemodynamics in conventional amplitude-coding dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS) with focused pulse transmission. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and performance of Nakagami statistical-feature parametric imaging to recover the above misestimation. METHODS: Logarithmic Nakagami parameter (m)-coding DCEUS scheme was investigated via simulation and in vitro MB phantoms as well as in vivo kidney-perfusion experiments of four rabbits in the uneven acoustic fields with two different focal depths. In vivo tissue artifacts for m estimation were suppressed by pulse-inversion second-harmonic imaging and its robustness was enhanced by multiscale moment-estimation strategy. Time-Nakagami-m curves and the corresponding perfusion metrics of intensity and volume were calculated from the logarithmic m-coding DCEUS images within the prefocal and focal regions. These curves and metrics were further compared with the perfusion curves and metrics estimated from the conventional amplitude-coding images within the same regions. RESULTS: Compared with amplitudes of nonlinear scattering MB echoes, their logarithmic m values were relatively independent of the changes in acoustics pressures. Compared with the fixed-scale moment-estimation, the perfusion intensity estimated from logarithmic m-coding DCEUS scheme using multiscale statistical moment-estimation had smaller differences between the prefocal and focal regions. The differences of perfusion intensity induced by an uneven acoustic field decreased to 3.47% ± 1.58 %. The differences decreased by the logarithmic m-coding DCEUS scheme were further regulated by threshold values of m estimation. CONCLUSIONS: The logarithmic m-coding DCEUS scheme could recover the underestimated MB backscattered-echoes and the misestimated perfusion intensity induced by the uneven acoustic field. The scheme had the potential to weaken the limitation of microvasculature identification and hemodynamic characterization marked by MBs within tissues or tumors in the uneven acoustic field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207