Dynamic polarization-insensitive BOTDA in direct-detection OFDM with CNN-based BFS extraction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a dynamic polarization-insensitive Brillouin optical time domain analyzer (D/PI-BOTDA) with orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) based on intensity-modulated direct-detection (IM-DD). A polarization-division-multiplexed (PDM) pump signal enables polarization diversity of the stimulated Brillouin scattering while a multi-frequency OFDM probe signal realizes dynamic sensing with single-shot transmission. We experimentally demonstrated distributed temperature sensing along a total 940-meter fiber with a temperature sensing coefficient of 1.2°C/MHz. The experimental results indicated a remarkable suppression of Brillouin gain fluctuation up to 4.38 times compared to the case without polarization diversity. To facilitate the Brillouin frequency shift (BFS) extraction process, we also implement a CNN-based BFS extraction method with SE-Res2Net block. The adopted algorithm achieves a higher accuracy than conventional curve fitting method, with a 10-time enhancement in the time efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".