MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212764871 · doi:10.1144/jgs2020-253

Formation of the Qiyugou porphyry gold system in East Qinling, China: insights from timing and source characteristics of Late Mesozoic magmatism

2022· article· en· W4212764871 on OpenAlexaff
Xin‐Kai Hu, Li Tang, Shouting Zhang, Toshiaki Tsunogae, M. Santosh, Li Sun, Christopher J. Spencer, Heejin Jeon, Liang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Geological Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryBrecciaLileZirconMagmatismMineralization (soil science)PorphyriticHornblendeDioritePlutonPorphyry copper depositPetrologyBiotitePartial meltingCrustQuartzFluid inclusionsTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Qiyugou gold deposit, located in the East Qinling Orogen, is characterized by porphyry, breccia pipe-hosted and fracture-controlled hydrothermal mineralization. Four intrusive phases are identified in this deposit: pre-mineralization quartz porphyry, syn-mineralization granite porphyry associated with breccia pipe-hosted mineralization, syn-mineralization hornblende monzogranite associated with porphyry mineralization and post-mineralization monzogranite porphyry. These granitoids are metaluminous, alkalic to calc-alkalic, shoshonitic to high-K series, and belong to highly fractionated I-type granitoids. Most of the Qiyugou granitoids show relatively lower Sr/Y (<40) and (La/Yb) N (average = 12.0) than the typical adakite-like rocks. The granitoids are strongly enriched in light rare earth elements (LREE) and large ion lithophile elements (LILE) and depleted in heavy rare earth elements (HREE) with slightly negative europium anomalies (except for hornblende monzogranite) and moderate depletion of high field strength elements (HFSE), mostly plotting in the range of the basement Taihua Group rocks. Zircon U–Pb ages of granite porphyry, hornblende monzogranite and monzogranite porphyry from the Qi189 pluton, and hornblende monzogranite beneath the J4 breccia pipe are 133.4 ± 0.8, 131.3 ± 0.9, 128.0 ± 0.7 and 129.9 ± 0.9 Ma, respectively. The ε Hf ( t ) values and T DM2 ages show a variation trend from −37.4 to −11.4 and from 3530 to 1912 Ma, consistent with Hf isotopic features of the Taihua Group. The ε Hf ( t ) values have a positive correlation with MgO and negative correlation with SiO 2 , indicating sustained involvement of mantle-derived materials. Notably, these granitoids have comparable δ 18 O zircon values ranging from 5.7 to 5.9‰. The covariations of geochemical and isotopic data indicate that these granitoids were produced by mixing of the partially melted Taihua Group basement with mantle-derived components. The Qiyugou granitoids were generated at different crustal levels by a lithospheric thinning process linked to the tectonic transition from compression to extension at 133–128 Ma. The hornblende monzogranite from the Qi189 pluton was probably more hydrous and resulted from a highly evolved magma after hornblende fractionation, which was favourable for porphyry mineralization. Our study provides insights into the formation of a porphyry gold system associated with a prolonged and active magmatic–hydrothermal system, upwelling of hot asthenosphere and intense mantle–crust interaction. Supplementary material : Tables giving compositions of the granitoids are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5835494

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Geological SocietySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207