MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212772948 · doi:10.47650/jpp.v4i2.372

Kondisi Lingkungan Fisik Rumah Dengan Kejadian ISPA Pada Balita di Wilayah Puskesmas Panambungan Kota Makassar

2022· article· id· W4212772948 on OpenAlexaff
Eustakia Jeni, Muharti Syamsul, Ivan Wijaya

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Promotif Preventif · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infeksi saluran pernapasan akut (ISPA) adalah penyakit saluran pernapasan akut yang disebabkan oleh agen infeksi yang ditularkan dari manusia kemanusia. WHO menyatakan ISPA menempati urutan ketiga dari 10 penyebab kematian di dunia dengan prevalensi angka kejadian sebesar 6,1% atau 3,46 juta kasus. Kejadian ISPA pada balita dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor antara lain ventilasi rumah, kepadatan hunian, kebiasaan merokok. Tujuan Penelitian untuk mengetahui informasi kondisi lingkungan fisik rumah dengan kejadian ISPA pada balita di wilayah kerja puskesmas Panambungan Kecamatan Mariso Kota Makassar. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode analitik observasional dengan desain Cross Sectional Study. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada Bulan Agustus tahun 2021 di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Penambungan Kota Makassar dengan jumlah sampel 50 responden yang dihitung menggunakan rumus Slovin. Penarikan Sampel dilakukan dengan teknik Non Random Sampling. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara wawancara menggunakan kuesioner. Data kemudian diolah kemudian dianalisis dengan uji Chi Square menggunakan SPSS dan selanjutnya disajikan dalam bentuk tabel dan narasi. Hasil uji satistik menunjukkanbahwa terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara ventilasi rumah (p=value= 0,015 < 0,05), Kepadatan hunian (p=value= 0,006 < 0,05) dan kebiasaan merokok (p=value= 0,00 < 0,05) dengan kejadian ISPA pada balita di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Penambungan Kota Makassar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Promotif PreventifSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207