MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212777698 · doi:10.1155/2022/7821525

A Cohort Study to Assess Cognitive Impairment and Its Effects on Older Patients in the Orthopedic Rehabilitation

2022· article· en· W4212777698 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Han Zhang, Bo Pang, Zheng Ma, Huimei Dong, Hongyi He, Lan Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Healthcare Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip and Femur Fractures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationOrthopedic surgeryCohortMedicineCohort studyCognitive impairmentPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCognitionPhysical therapyGerontologyPsychiatryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. The cognitive role of older patients is regularly not investigated in orthopedic rehabilitation, after the elective as well as the nonelective operation. The objective of this research is to investigate the cognitive disorder and its influence over the duration of stay along with the functional consequences of the older patients who were admitted to orthopedic rehabilitation. Material and Methods. The inclusion criteria for this study were the patients with age above 50 years; who were admitted with the detection of orthopedic impairment and the surgery both elective and nonelective, investigated utilizing the MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) over admission, MBI (Modified Barthel Index), and FIM (Function Independent Measure) over admission and discharge status; and were discharged from the hospital. The demography, as well as the clinical data, comprising of the duration of stay, age and the detection was also reported. Result. Of the 109 admitted patients, 80 patients were included in the study where n = 47 (58.75%) patients were females and n = 33 (41.25%) were males. The age group range was 50 to 94 years with a mean age of 78.5 years (SD = 8.27). The diagnostic groups included for the study were fractured neck of femur (n = 34; 42.5%), orthopedic surgery (n = 22; 27.5%), and other orthopedic surgery (n = 24; 30%). The mean duration of rehabilitation stay was reported as 34 (4.39), where the MoCA was reported as 22.17 (2.44); functional independence measures were as follows: motor admission as 53.97 (7.55), motor discharge as 76.27 (5.35), cognitive admission as 30.71 (1.99), and cognitive discharge as 31.85 (1.94). Here, the diagnosis was done over the fractured neck of the femur (i.e., NOF being 34 (42.5%), elective surgeries 22 (27.5%), and other orthopedic as 24 (30%)). Conclusion. An excessive percentage of older-age patients in a rehabilitation unit with elective as well as nonelective diagnoses comprises the cognitive disorder. The cognitive screening was advised for all the older age patients in the rehabilitation units to report a specific rehabilitation plan to enhance the consequences along with the duration of stay. There is further study required to explore different cognitive strategies to enhance the rehabilitation consequences among older-age orthopedic patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Healthcare EngineeringSame topicHip and Femur FracturesFrench-language works237,207