A195 GEOEPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHANGES DUE TO ALTERATIONS IN DIAGNOSTIC ROME CRITERIA FOR IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a positive diagnosis based on consensus opinions. The Rome (R) criteria, have gone through 4 rounds. R4 restricted diagnosis of IBS over R3, reducing global prevalence. Previously, there were no correlations of world distributions of IBS and Inflammatory Bowel Disease [IBD](Lovell). There are also epidemiological studies showing relationships between IBD and national wealth. Aims We reevaluate relationships among different R criteria and latitude(Lat), lactose digestion status (LNP), human development index(HDI), gross domestic product/capita(GDP/c), Crohn’s disease (CD and ulcerative colitis (UC) incidence(i) and prevalence(p). Methods Literature on world prevalence of national IBS (Oka,Sperber), IBD rates (Ng), and GDP (Lopez Ruiz) (4) were sought on PubMed and Google Scholar.National HDI(08 or 2016) were available on the internet (http://hdr.undp.org/en/data). National lactase distributions and latitudes were quoted (Szilagyi). Target dates were for the year 2008±8yrs. After log transformation of IBD incidence, Pearson’s correlations were carried out.(strong at; r ≥0.7, moderate ≥0.5, weak ≤ 0.49, negligible ≤ 0.3). (significance was p<0.05). Results Correlations of HDI08 and HDI16 was 0.98. Comparisons of R2 and a composite based on Manning, R 1 and 2 (Lovell) was r = 0.96 (N21 countries), Correlation of R 3 and 4 were r = 0.85 (N17). Correlations of R2 and R3 or R4 were negligible (r = -0.2 (n15) and -0.12 (N22). Correlations of R2 and both economic metrics were weak but significant (r = 0.42 – r = 0.49, p < 0.03 - < 0.001). However, correlations of metrics with R3 were non significant and negligible with R4. Comparisons of R2 with LNP or Lat were negligible, but those of R3 or R4 with Lat were significant. Comparisons of R3 with CDp showed a strong correlation while R4 showed a weak but significant correlation with UCi. R2 had negligible correlations with IBD. Conclusions Although, these results are based on limited data variations in R criteria have changed relations with IBS prevalence.Earlier R criteria showed increased IBS in poorer nations. The recent R3 and R4 criteria are independent of national economy, but show more relations with increasing latitudes. Consequences of the change include R3 and 4 reflecting western society symptoms perhaps linking it more with IBD.It is unclear if this new relationship incorporates an irritable inflammatory bowel syndrome (Gajula).The generalizability therefore of the new R4 criteria may still be limited. Table: Rome criteria compared to variables. Statistical significance * < 0.03, ** ≤ 0.05 Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".