A19 PROTEOMICS FOR PREDICTING NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS IN THE PREMATURE NEONATE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) represents a major challenge in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). The search for indicators that could be used to predict the development of NEC, which would provide more time to apply targeted interventions in the NICU before the appearance of the symptoms is required. Aims The aim of the present work was to investigate the potential of fecal proteomics signatures for NEC prediction Methods In the present study, stools from 132 very low birth weight infants (less than 1500 g and born younger than 30 weeks) were collected daily in the context of a multi-center prospective study. Seven of the infants received a stage 3 NEC diagnosis. Stools collected up to 10 days before diagnosis were included and each NEC was matched with 2 non-NEC controls. These samples had been used to evaluate various biomarkers by ELISA in a previous study, which revealed that lipocalin-2 and calprotectin used in conjunction can allow the prediction of half of very low birth weight infants 7 days before their NEC diagnosis (Thibault et al., Ped Res 2021). Herein, we explore a proteomics approach to investigate whether this predictability can be improved. The same stool samples were thus prepared and processed for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometer analysis (TripleTOF 5600) coupled with SWATH acquisition software. Results Data were analyzed by Skyline using the peptide transition list of a spectral library leading to the identification of 1374 proteins with a minimum of two peptides. From these, 192 proteins (1061 peptides) were detected at strong levels in a majority of the samples while 37 of them (2–4 peptides/protein, 102 peptides) were found to display significantly altered levels between NEC and non-NEC samples (17 up; 20 down) based on statistical analyzes and displaying an AUC ≥ 0.7 (ROC curve). Interestingly, both sets of peptides for the NEC samples were significantly different from controls for all three tested periods (group 1: -10 to -7, group 2: -6 to -3, and group 3: -2 to +1 days before diagnosis) using One-way ANOVA Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, p < 0.001. Furthermore, analyzing the data for each infant confirmed the usefulness of the peptide signature for predicting NEC development in 6 of the 7 available cases one week in advance of the diagnosis. Conclusions Taken together, these results indicate that stool proteomics represents a promising potential approach for predicting NEC in very low-weight infants. Funding Agencies CIHR
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".