MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212796590 · doi:10.1016/s1359-6128(07)70336-1

Alfa Laval AB, Sweden

2007· article· en· W4212796590 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePump Industry Analyst · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSphaleriteGeochemistryGeologyGreenschistHydrothermal circulationQuartzPrecambrianVolcanic rockCalciteSulfideSedimentary rockMineralogyRecrystallization (geology)MetamorphismVolcanoMetallurgyPyritePetrologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The massive sulfide deposits of the Skellefte district are located in northern Sweden. The ores are hosted by Precambrian submarine volcanics and sedimentary rocks. Both rocks and ores have been deformed and metamorphosed, mainly to greenschist facies.Aqueous two-phase (liquid-vapor) primary inclusions in sphalerite, quartz and calcite from six mines (Rävliden, Kristineberg, Östra Högkulla, Bjurträsk, Renström and Långdal) indicate that the sulfide ores were formed under non-boiling conditions during two major stages of hydrothermal activity at temperatures of 210° and 295°C, respectively. The ore-forming fluids were CaNaCl-bearing hydrothermal solutions with a salt content of 4±2 eq. wt.% NaCl. Later recrystallization of the ores occurred at lower temperatures involving solutions with higher salinities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it