MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212796800 · doi:10.1111/hex.13460

Outside Back Cover: Volume 25 Issue 1

2022· article· en· W4212796800 on OpenAlexaff
Xiujing Hu, Haoxiang Wang, Yuting Li, Xiao‐Ya Wu, Yi Wang, Jiaheng Chen, Jia‐Ji Wang, Samuel Yeung Shan Wong, Stewart W Mercer

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Expectations · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Disease Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCover (algebra)Primary careHealth carePrimary health careProcess (computing)NursingPsychologyComputer scienceMedicineFamily medicinePolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Outside Back Cover Caption: The cover image is based on the Research Article Healthcare needs, experiences and treatment burden in primary care patients with multimorbidity: An evaluation of process of care from patients' perspectives by Harry H.X. Wang et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13363.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8740.787

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth ExpectationsSame topicChronic Disease Management StrategiesFrench-language works237,207