Surface Plasmon Resonance Based Refractive Index Biosensor: A External Sensing Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A surface plasmon resonance (SPR) based sensor founded on Photonic crystal fiber (PCF) is suggested and numerically analyzed in the manuscript. The refractive index (RI) detecting SPR based sensor has the ability to identify the analyte range from 1.33 to 1.4. Pure silica is used as a base material and it has high RI value than the analyte RI. Furthermore, an analyte layer and chemically stable gold (Au) layer are also placed at the sensor design. The simulations are done based on the Finite Element Method (FEM). Here, the scaled-down approach has the necessity to increase phase matching point within the core mode and surface plasmon polariton (SPP) mode which tends to the sensor to reach high sensitivity response. At the intersect point of core and SPP mode, the loss curve shows a maximum peak value. The suggested sensor shows the highest wavelength sensitivity (WS) response of 35,943.22 nm/RIU, amplitude sensitivity (AS) response of 2321.36 RIU −1 , sensor resolution of 9.04×10 −6 RIU, and Figure of merit (FOM) value of 600. It is noted that all the optical parameters show better performance analysis. Furthermore, an external sensing approach provides more fabrication feasibility which marks the offered sensor more suitable for practical experimentation. Besides, the investigated sensor provides the maximum and rapid sensing performance that will be helpful for microfluidic analyte detection, detection of biomolecules, medical diagnostics, virus detection, security, and bio-imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".