MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212801530 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4d2a

The Global Dynamical Atlas of the Milky Way Mergers: Constraints from Gaia EDR3–based Orbits of Globular Clusters, Stellar Streams, and Satellite Galaxies

2022· article· en· W4212801530 on OpenAlexafffund
Khyati Malhan, Rodrigo Ibata, Sanjib Sharma, Benoît Famaey, M. Bellazzini, R. G. Carlberg, Richard D’Souza, Zhen Yuan, Nicolas F. Martin, Guillaume F. Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBrookhaven National LaboratoryNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieNational Development and Reform CommissionMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueChinese Academy of SciencesAgence Nationale de la RechercheMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesYork UniversityGruber FoundationCarnegie Mellon UniversityCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityPrinceton UniversityAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonEuropean Space AgencyJohns Hopkins UniversityInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsHarvard UniversityOhio State UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónYale UniversityVanderbilt UniversityUniversity of ArizonaAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungNational Science FoundationU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsGlobular clusterMilky WayAstronomyGalaxySatelliteSatellite galaxyAstrophysicsStar clusterAtlas (anatomy)Galactic astronomyStellar dynamicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Milky Way halo was predominantly formed by the merging of numerous progenitor galaxies. However, our knowledge of this process is still incomplete, especially in regard to the total number of mergers, their global dynamical properties and their contribution to the stellar population of the Galactic halo. Here, we uncover the Milky Way mergers by detecting groupings of globular clusters, stellar streams, and satellite galaxies in action ( J ) space. While actions fully characterize the orbits, we additionally use the redundant information on their energy ( E ) to enhance the contrast between the groupings. For this endeavor, we use Gaia EDR3‒based measurements of 170 globular clusters, 41 streams, and 46 satellites to derive their J and E . To detect groups, we use the ENLINK software, coupled with a statistical procedure that accounts for the observed phase-space uncertainties of these objects. We detect a total of N = 6 groups, including the previously known mergers Sagittarius, Cetus, Gaia‒Sausage/Enceladus, LMS-1/Wukong, Arjuna/Sequoia/I’itoi, and one new merger that we call Pontus. All of these mergers, together, comprise 62 objects (≈25% of our sample). We discuss their members, orbital properties, and metallicity distributions. We find that the three most-metal-poor streams of our galaxy—“C-19” ([Fe/H] = −3.4 dex), “Sylgr” ([Fe/H] = −2.9 dex), and “Phoenix” ([Fe/H] = −2.7 dex)—are associated with LMS-1/Wukong, showing it to be the most-metal-poor merger. The global dynamical atlas of Milky Way mergers that we present here provides a present-day reference for galaxy formation models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations163
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207