Abstracts from the 6th Respiratory Effectiveness Group Summit, 18–20 March, 2021
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rationale: In a recent report (1) control status by clinical criteria (CC) was noted to be a better predictor of exacerbations compared to the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) criteria and that control was more likely to be achieved using clinical compared to CAT criteria.In the present report we describe medication use and COPD control based on clinical and CAT criteria.Methods: This is a post-hoc cross-sectional analysis of data of the REG control prospective international study.A total of 307 patients were analysed (mean age 68.6 years and mean FEV1(%)= 52.5%).Results: See attached results tables.Medication use and COPD control based on CAT.Based on Clinical and CAT Criteria, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) in controlled patients was greater in individuals receiving LAMA alone compared to LABA/ 1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".