Filosofia de direita no Brasil durante o período entre ditaduras: o Instituto Brasileiro de Filosofia e o pensamento de Miguel Reale (1949-1964)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A partir da perspectiva da história dos intelectuais, discutimos a criação do Instituto Brasileiro de Filosofia (IBF), responsável pela publicação da Revista Brasileira de Filosofia (RBF), no contexto da História do Brasil republicano entre as ditaduras do Estado Novo e a Militar (1946-1964), e a contribuição de seu líder, Miguel Reale, para a elaboração do pensamento autocrático e pós-integralista. Neste novo momento, após sua ruptura com o integralismo, Reale liderou um novo tipo de organização de intelectuais que se ligava, internacionalmente, com os delineamentos do filósofo italiano Benedetto Croce e, em São Paulo, com a oligarquia daquele estado. Fazemos uma problematização teórica a partir de conceitos fundamentais formulados por Antonio Gramsci para a abordagem da história dos intelectuais, de modo a elucidar as articulações que são feitas entre as ditaduras pelos intelectuais de direita.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".