Development and validation of novel radiomics-based nomograms for the prediction of EGFR mutations and Ki-67 proliferation index in non-small cell lung cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: ) mutations and the Ki-67 proliferation index of non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: mutations and the Ki-67 proliferation index were measured from tumor tissues. A total of 1,287 radiomic features were extracted, and a three-stage feature selection method was implemented to acquire the most valuable radiomic features. Finally, the radiomic scores and nomograms of the two tasks were established and tested. Receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curves were used to evaluate their prediction performance and clinical utility. Results: mutations. After feature selection, 10 features were used to establish radiomic score, which showed good performance [area under the curve (AUC) =0.800] in the validation cohort. The radiomic nomogram had an AUC of 0.798 (95% CI: 0.664 to 0.931) with a C-index of 0.798 in the validation cohort. In task [2], gender, smoking status, histological type, and stage showed a significant correlation with Ki-67 proliferation index expression. A total of 28 features were selected to develop a radiomic score, with an AUC of 0.820 in the validation cohort. The final nomogram showed an AUC of 0.828 (95% CI: 0.703 to 0.953) with a C-index of 0.828 in the validation cohort. Conclusions: mutations and Ki-67 proliferation index in non-small cell lung cancer can be predicted efficiently by the novel radiomic scores and nomograms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".