MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4212811829 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1330

Erratum: Probing the shape and history of the Milky Way halo with orbital spectral analysis

2013· erratum· en· W4212811829 on OpenAlexaff
Monica Valluri, Victor P. Debattista, Thomas Quinn, Rok Roškar, James Wadsley

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2013
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMilky WayHaloAstrophysicsAstronomyGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper ‘Probing the shape and history of the Milky Way halo with orbital spectral analysis’ was published in MNRAS, 419, 1951 (2012). In Table 1, we reported values of r200 which followed the convention adopted previously (Debattista et al. 2008; Valluri et al. 2010), where this was defined as the radius at which ρ = 200ρcrit rather than the standard definition of r200 – the radius within which the enclosed mass has average density 200 × ρcrit. r200 as determined by the standard definition is 170 kpc for model SNFWD and 379 kpc for models SA1, LA1, TA1, IA1 and SA2. The corresponding M200 for these models are 5.7 × 1011 and 6.3 × 1012 M⊙ , respectively. Other quantities in Table 1 remain unchanged. This change in the value of r200 does not affect our results which are independent of this quantity. In Section 3.2.2, we stated that for model LA1, all the points that clustered around the vertical resonance lines labelled ‘1, 0 and −1 y-axis tubes’ in Fig. 6 were intermediate-axis tubes. We have reanalysed the orbital characteristics of these orbits and find that they are all resonant box orbits and not y-axis tubes. In fact model LA1 has no intermediate-axis tubes. The points that cluster along the ‘1, 0 and −1’ line on the frequency map are resonant box orbits, which are elongated along the y-axis and provide the support for the enhanced mass density along the y-axis within the inner 25 kpc. In Section 3.2.4, Fig. 8 (triaxial halo with an intermediate-axis disc) was incorrect due to mislabelling of the coordinate system in which the orbits were integrated. The standard coordinate system used in this paper for the frequency maps has (x, y, z) representing the long, intermediate and short axes, respectively (see Fig. 4 of the published version). However, the data files used to generate the published version of Fig. 8 had the intermediate axis incorrectly labelled as z (rather than y by our standard convention). Consequently, in the discussion of the frequency map in Fig. 8, we claimed that there were intermediate-axis tubes at large radii. Fig. 1 of this erratum shows an updated version of the frequency maps in Fig. 8 of the published paper with the correct definition of y as the intermediate axis (and the axis about which the disc is symmetric). In these corrected frequency maps intermediate-axis tubes appear only at small radii. These orbits are generated by resonant trapping by the disc (as they are in all the other models in the published paper) and consequently appear at only small radii where the disc dominates. Left: frequency map of 104 halo orbits with rg < 200 kpc after the disc grows perpendicular to the intermediate (y) axis in the triaxial potential (model IA1). Right: about 104 orbits from the inner halo of the same model. In the left-hand plot the y-axis tube family is populated by tightly bound (blue) points indicating that this family originates from resonant trapping by the disc. The fraction of orbits associated with this family is significantly increased in the solar neighbourhood plot (right). The map shows a prominent clustering of tightly bound orbits along the vertical line corresponding to intermediate-axis tubes with Ωx/Ωz = 1 at values of Ωy/Ωz > 1. Since the disc is symmetric about the y-axis, at small radii the halo becomes more oblate in this region, with y as its symmetry axis. The appearance of the intermediate-axis tubes in the vicinity of the disc in this model is consistent with what we found for other models. Because the inner part of the halo has been flattened by the disc, what was the intermediate-axis direction of the original triaxial potential and is still the intermediate axis of the global potential has become the short axis of the inner halo. Additionally, what was the short-axis direction of the original triaxial halo and is still the short axis of the global potential has now become the intermediate axis for the inner halo. All other results in the published paper remain unchanged.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→