MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212820049 · doi:10.4088/pcc.21m02915

Prevalence and Risk Factors for QTc Prolongation in Acute Psychiatric Hospitalization

2022· article· en· W4212820049 on OpenAlex
Benedetta Salvati, Alessandro Miola, Tommaso Toffanin, Giorgio Pigato, Chiara Pavan, Angela Favaro, Fabio Sambataro, Marco Solmi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQT intervalMedicineProlongationTorsades de pointesInternal medicineCohortElectrocardiographyLong QT syndromeHeart rateCardiologyCohort studyAnesthesiaBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Prolongation of corrected QT (QTc) interval increases the risk of severe ventricular arrhythmias, in particular torsades de pointes. Patients with severe mental illness (SMI) represent a vulnerable population. This study aimed to measure the prevalence of QTc prolongation in inpatients with SMI and to identify risk factors for QTc prolongation. Methods: Demographic, clinical, anthropometric, laboratory, and electrocardiographic information was extracted from the electronic records of a cohort of patients hospitalized in a psychiatry inpatient unit between July 1, 2017, and July 22, 2019. The primary outcome was the estimation of prevalence of QTc prolongation. The secondary outcome was the identification of risk factors for QTc prolongation. Results: A total of 597 admissions were included. Only 1.4% had a QTc > 500 msec, while 11.6% had a QTc > 460 msec. The proportion of women with a QTc > 470 msec was 3.6% and men with a QTc > 450 msec was 7.3%. Several risk factors were individually associated with QTc prolongation. In the multivariate model explaining almost one-third of QTc variance, female sex (P = .04), older age (P = .011), heart rate (P < .001), systolic blood pressure (P = .042), potassium (P = .012), hemoglobin (P = .006), number of antipsychotics (P = .026), and treatment with clotiapine (P = .012) and clozapine (P = .003) were associated with QTc length. Several factors beyond pharmacologic treatment identify subjects at risk for QTc prolongation, and polypharmacotherapy does not seem to increase the risk of QTc prolongation. Conclusions: QTc prolongation was rare in this cohort of SMI inpatients. Most of the risk factors involved in QTc prolongation are unchangeable elements or linked to general medical conditions, and only a few are modifiable factors, including psychotropic treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it