MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212827627 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.196

A197 ACUTE ILEITIS IN ADULT PATIENT: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF PATIENT OUTCOMES

2022· article· en· W4212827627 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie-Pier Bachand, Alethea Paradis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAppendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIleitisRadiological weaponRetrospective cohort studyRadiologyEmergency departmentContext (archaeology)Endoscopic ultrasoundInternal medicineCrohn's diseaseDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Rising availability of medical imaging exams in the emergency room potentially leads to an increase of ileitis findings by imaging in a context of gastrointestinal symptoms. However, it can be difficult to determine the clinical significance of this radiological finding in an acute consultation setting and to establish the relevant investigations. Aims The aim of this study is to describe the current management and the long-term outcome of patients with diagnostic of acute ileitis on imaging during an emergency consultation in our center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke(CHUS). Methods We performed a retrospective study of all patients diagnosed with ileitis by abdominal ultrasound or computed tomography (CT scan) during a visit in our emergency department over the years 2010 and 2017. Patients with previous diagnosis of Crohn disease were excluded. Data collected were clinical, radiological and endoscopic at diagnostic and over at least 3 years following the initial visit. Results A total of 118 files were reviewed. The initial imaging modality was 43% ultrasound and 57% CT scan. 36% of patients had an ileocolonoscopy within one month of the initial visit. Of these, 60% demonstrated macroscopic endoscopic abnormalities. 51% of patients had follow-up imaging within 3 months of the initial consultation. 64% of these images demonstrated persistence of pathological changes in the ileal region. Only 48% had a stool culture at diagnosis. 72% of patients met a gastroenterologist and 45% saw a general surgeon. The most common cause of ileitis was an infectious origin at 44% predominantly with Yersinia enterocolitica and Campylobacter jejuni. 13% received a diagnostic of Crohn disease. 20% of ileitis remained undetermined. Among these, there was a case of Crohn’s disease which was eventually diagnosed 2 years later. The initial factors associated with a diagnosis of Crohn’s disease were family history of inflammatory bowel disease (OR 6.17 95% CI 1.67 to 22.781 p = 0.006), extra-digestive manifestations (OR 23.31 95% CI 2.255 to 240.92 p = 0.008), discontinuous impairment at initial imaging (OR 19.8 95% CI 4.284 to 91.52 p = 0.000), presence of stenosis at initial imaging (OR 14.429 95% CI 1.227 to 169.68 p = 0.034), the presence of abscess or collection on imaging (OR 11.54 95% CI 1.76 to 75.63 p = 0.011) and wall thickness in mm (1.22 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40 p = 0.005). Conclusions Our study shows that the majority of acute ileitis found on imaging are of infectious origin. A portion of acute ileitis corresponded to the initial presentation of Crohn’s disease. Thus, we believe that it is preferable to offer at least clinical follow-up to patients with acute ileitis on imaging and to consider additional investigation by imaging and / or colonoscopy when symptoms persist and this particularly in presence of factors associated with Crohn’s disease. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicAppendicitis Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207