“Rehabilitación del paciente adulto con sarcomas de tejidos blandos en miembros inferiores y cirugía de salvamento.”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La rehabilitación en el contexto de cirugía de salvamento en sarcomas de tejidos blandos requiere un enfoque específico dadas sus características únicas. Esta tiene como objetivo valorar y aumentar la funcionalidad del paciente en la medida de lo posible. Aún no hay consenso en cuanto a protocolos de rehabilitación posterior a esta cirugía. Aquí se presenta una revisión de la literatura más actualizada para establecer las posibles intervenciones en el tratamiento rehabilitador. El potencial restaurativo de la cirugía de salvamento puede aumentar de manera significativa con un manejo en rehabilitación desde el inicio del proceso. Las recomendaciones en rehabilitación son variadas, no obstante, cada paciente presenta características únicas por lo que el tratamiento debe individualizarse. Es fundamental contar un equipo multidisciplinario y con escalas de calidad de vida y de funcionalidad, como el Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, para valorar la adecuada evolución de los pacientes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".