MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212834925 · doi:10.5001/omj.2022.78

The Impact of Duty Hour Limits on Sleep Quality of Resident: A Cross-sectional Study

2022· article· en· W4212834925 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOman Medical Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCross-sectional studySleep (system call)Sleep qualityQuality (philosophy)DutyEnvironmental healthPsychiatryPathologyInsomnia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Resident physicians are particularly prone to sleep disturbance due to long shift hours and excessive workload. Despite the numerous measures undertaken to improve their wellbeing, it is still unknown if limiting the work shift duration would improve sleep quality. We sought to compare sleep quality, anxiety, and depression before and after implementing duty hour limits. We also aim to evaluate how satisfaction with life is related to sleep quality, anxiety, and depression. Methods: We used a self-reported questionnaire to obtain data about sleep quality, anxiety, and depression using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) scales, respectively. Using data from a previous study, we compared those parameters before and after implementing duty hour reduction across several specialties at King Abdullah University Hospital, Jordan. Furthermore, we investigated residents’ life satisfaction using the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Results: One hundred and eighty residents filled the questionnaire (median age = 26.5 years). Males reported higher rates of poor sleep quality while females had higher rates of anxiety and depression. Decreasing the duration of on-call shifts from 32 to 24 hours decreased the prevalence of poor sleep quality from 91.5% to 83.2% (p =0.038), and smoking rates decreased from 30.4% to 12.5% (p < 0.001). More than six on-calls per month were associated with poorer quality of sleep. Night float shifts significantly decreased rates of moderate and severe PHQ-4 scores (p < 0.001). In addition, 63.3% of residents were satisfied with life. Life satisfaction was associated with enhanced sleep quality and lower PHQ-4 scores (p =0.007 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Optimizing shift scheduling and duration can positively influence rates of sleep quality, anxiety, depression, and smoking. More interventions should be tackled along with duty hour limits to optimize residents’ life satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it