Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Similarity Query With Access Control in eHealthcare
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Similarity queries, giving a way to disease diagnosis based on similar patients, have wide applications in eHealthcare and are essentially demanded to be processed under fine-grained access policies due to the high sensitivity of healthcare data. One efficient and flexible way to implement such queries is to outsource healthcare data and the corresponding query services to a powerful cloud. Nevertheless, considering data privacy, healthcare data are usually outsourced in an encrypted form and required to be accessed in a privacy-preserving way. In the past years, many schemes have been proposed for privacy-preserving similarity queries. However, none of them is applicable to achieve data access control and access pattern privacy preservation. Aiming at this challenge, we propose an efficient and access pattern privacy-preserving similarity range query scheme with access control (named EPSim-AC). In our proposed scheme, we first design a novel tree structure, called$k$-d-PB tree, to index healthcare data and introduce an efficient$k$-d-PB tree based similarity query algorithm with access control. Second, to balance the search efficiency and access pattern privacy of$k$-d-PB tree, we also define a weakened access pattern privacy, called$k$-d-PB tree’s$\beta $-access pattern unlinkability. After that, we preserve the privacy of$k$-d-PB tree based similarity queries with access control through a symmetric homomorphic encryption scheme and present our detailed EPSim-AC scheme. Finally, we analyze the security of our scheme and also conduct extensive experiments to evaluate its performance. The results demonstrate that our scheme can guarantee$k$-d-PB tree’s$\beta $-access pattern unlinkability and has high efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".