MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212862630 · doi:10.24002/biota.v14i1.2635

Diatom dan Paleolimnologi: Studi Komparasi Perjalanan Sejarah Danau Lac Saint-Augustine Quebeq-City, Canada dan Danau Rawa Pening Indonesia

2009· article· en· W4212862630 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tri Retnaningsih Soeprobowati, Suwarno Hadisusanto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biota · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiatomEutrophicationSedimentWater qualityRange (aeronautics)Aquatic ecosystemBaseline (sea)Water columnEcologyGeographyOceanographyEnvironmental scienceGeologyPaleontologyBiologyNutrient

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diatoms are a micro-alga dominates in the aquatic ecosystem. Their silicious cell wall able to preserve death diatoms in the sediment for long periods of time, therefore, diatoms have an important role in the paleolimnological analysis. Diatoms assemblages in the sediment layer express the water quality whenever the diatom lives. This article provides information how to apply diatom on the paleo-limnological analysis, supporting with the case study in the Lac Saint-Augustine Quebec-City Canada and Rawa Pening Lake Indonesia. Modern diatom and the water quality from spatial and temporal range are used as a calibration set. The diatoms of below layers, then, Weighted Averaging (WA) with the calibration set to reconstruct the water quality in the past. Previously, both in Canada and Indonesia, those lakes were oligotrophic and sharply change into eutrophic condition since a lot of human activities developed around the lakes (anthropogenic factors). Naturally, the maturity of lake can not avoid and the succession had been fast by eutrophication. Paleolimnological approach provides baseline data in the past to develop the appropriate lake management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BiotaSame topicHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationFrench-language works237,207