Visualizing RNA Structures by SAXS-Driven MD Simulations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The biological role of biomolecules is intimately linked to their structural dynamics. Experimental or computational techniques alone are often insufficient to determine accurate structural ensembles in atomic detail. We use all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and couple it to small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments to resolve the structural dynamics of RNA molecules. To accomplish this task, we utilize a set of re-weighting and biasing techniques tailored for RNA molecules. To showcase our approach, we study two RNA molecules: a riboswitch that shows structural variations upon ligand binding, and a two-way junction RNA that displays structural heterogeneity and sensitivity to salt conditions. Integration of MD simulations and experiments allows the accurate construction of conformational ensembles of RNA molecules. We observe a dynamic change of the SAM-I riboswitch conformations depending on its binding partners. The binding of SAM and Mg 2+ cations stabilizes the compact state. The absence of Mg 2+ or SAM leads to the loss of tertiary contacts, resulting in a dramatic expansion of the riboswitch conformations. The sensitivity of RNA structures to the ionic strength demonstrates itself in the helix junction helix (HJH). The HJH shows non-monotonic compaction as the ionic strength increases. The physics-based picture derived from the experimentally guided MD simulations allows biophysical characterization of RNA molecules. All in all, SAXS-guided MD simulations offer great prospects for studying RNA structural dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".