IEEE Power Engineering Society 2008 General Meeting Control Center Issues NERC Reliability Standards Development
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) is a nonprofit corporation formed for the purpose of becoming the North American electric reliability organization (ERO). NERC's predecessor organization, the North American Electric Reliability Council, was formed in 1968 as a result of the Northeast blackout in 1965 to promote the reliability of the bulk power systems of North America. Since its formation in 1968, NERC has been committed to ensuring the reliability of the North American bulk power system. To achieve that, NERC develops and enforces reliability standards; assesses North American bulk power system adequacy annually; audits owners, operators, and users for preparedness; and educates trains, and certifies industry personnel. NERC is a self-regulatory organization, subject to oversight by the United States (U.S.) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and governmental authorities in Canada. This paper discusses the NERC control center issues and the development of reliability standards for power systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it