MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212880037 · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.220110.223

By What Means Can the Chinese Government Implement Policies to Aid in the Increase of Fertility Rate of Working Women?

2022· article· en· W4212880037 on OpenAlexaff
Lu Kai

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)FertilityTotal fertility rateComputer scienceDemographyFamily planningSociologyResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

China's declining population results in a smaller future labor force and threatens the economy coupled with its aging population. To ameliorate this issue, this paper suggests that the Chinese government focus on mitigating the discrimination to female workers as well as providing more job security to workers taking parental leave to boost China's fertility rate. This allows more flexibility regarding the division of responsibility of raising a child and reduces the negative impact pregnancy can have on a worker's professional career, thus incentivizing him/her to have more children. To achieve these goals, the Chinese government should unify the disparity between paternal and maternal laws in China, use campaigns to promote a more open mindset and encourage the behavior of fathers contributing to the upbring of children, and mandate corporations to purchase parental insurances for all its workers by combining it with the basic medical insurance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0120.017
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities researchSame topicDemographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFrench-language works237,207