MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212882557 · doi:10.1007/s12551-022-00938-6

Biophysical Reviews: from the umbra of 2020–2021 into the antumbra of 2022

2022· editorial· en· W4212882557 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiophysical Reviews · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEnvironmental Monitoring and Data Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNuclear PhysicsMasarykova UniverzitaUniversidad Nacional de QuilmesUniversité de BordeauxUniversidade de LisboaUniversity of Cape TownUniversité Paris DiderotUniversidad de MurciaWaseda UniversityUniversidade de São PauloUniversity of CincinnatiTsinghua UniversityMenzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of LondonMedizinischen Hochschule HannoverYale UniversityUniversity of GlasgowVrije Universiteit AmsterdamUniversity of OxfordMcGill UniversityInstitut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique (INRIA)Università degli Studi di MilanoEmory UniversityUniversiti Brunei DarussalamKanazawa UniversityMassey UniversityUniversity of PittsburghUniversidad Nacional de CórdobaUniversidad de la República UruguayQueen Mary University of LondonUniversity of TokyoRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteUniversity of MiamiYork UniversityVictor Chang Cardiac Research InstituteSungkyunkwan UniversityLa Trobe UniversityKing's College London
KeywordsLibrary scienceMembrane biologyEngineering ethicsEditorial boardPolitical scienceOperations researchComputer scienceNanotechnologyChemistryEngineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This sub-Editorial for Volume 14 Issue 1 (2022) first makes comment on the current issue and then describes matters of interest related to the journal's activities in 2022-chief among which are (i.) the announcement of the winner of the 2022 Michèle Auger Award for Young Scientists' Independent Research, (ii.) an outline of this year's finalized Special Issue (SI) lineup, (iii.) a description of a new production service offered by Springer to those submitting to the Biophysical Reviews journal, and (iv.) an introduction of newly appointed members of the Biophysical Reviews' Editorial Board.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it