MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4212884121 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.140

A141 IS SURGERY STILL THE ONLY TREATMENT OPTION FOR CURABLE RECTAL CANCER?

2022· article· en· W4212884121 on OpenAlexaff
T. Vuong, Aurélie Garant, Farzin Khosrow‐Khavar, Slobodan Dević, Shirin A. Enger, Marylise Boutros, Alan Cohen, Corey Miller, Garrett Friedman, Polymnia Galiatsatos, Vinh Nguyen, Nicolas Benoit, Hue Thai, H Diec, C Desgroseilliers, Julio Faria, Carol‐Ann Vasilevsky

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTotal mesorectal excisionInterim analysisRandomized controlled trialColorectal cancerBrachytherapyRadiation therapyClinical endpointExternal beam radiotherapyCapecitabineSurgeryCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Rectal cancer is curable by standard surgery with Total Mesorectal Excision (TME). However, there are well known associated long-term bowel and sexual dysfunctions. Non-operative management (NOM) is an emerging treatment for patients with operable rectal cancer. There is evidence supporting dose response for tumor control in rectal adenocarcinoma. Aims In the era of modern technologies, Image-guided adaptive endorectal brachytherapy is a means to deliver local radiotherapy boost treatments. We explored its role in a randomized phase II/III trial (NCT03051464) for patients aiming to achieve cure without surgery. Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) free survival at 2 years was the primary endpoint. We now present the interim analysis upon accrual of the first 40 patients. Methods In randomized trial, patients with operable cT2-3ab N0 M0 rectal cancer received 45 Gy in 25 fractions of pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concurrent 5-FU/ Capecitabine. They were randomized to receive either an EBRT boost of 9 Gy in 5 fractions (Arm A), or three weekly adaptive brachytherapy boosts for a total of 30 Gy in 3 fractions (Arm B). Results Forty patients were included (20 per arm). The median age was 66 years; baseline characteristics were well balanced in terms of age, tumor location, T stage and tumor size (Table 1). The acute treatment related toxicities are similar as shown in table 2 but in arm B, there were two deaths: one patient died during his chemotherapy and external beam treatment from congestive heart failure and one patient from a heart attack after treatment prior to salvage TME surgery. The proportion of complete clinical response was 50% (n=10/20) in Arm A and 90% in Arm B (n=18/20). With a median follow-up of 2.2 years, local regrowth at 2 years occurred in 4/10 patients (40%) in Arm A and 4/18 patients (22%) in Arm B. TME-free survival rate at 2 years was 45.9% in Arm A and 85.1% in Arm B (p=0.0036) (Figure 1). Conclusions The interim analysis of this trial suggests that these two strategies of radiation dose escalation are feasible and lead to high chances of organ preservation in patients with operable rectal cancer. The Independent Monitoring Comittee (IDMC) approved the continuation of patient recruitment in the phase III study as planned. Funding Agencies Elekta

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments→French-language works237,207→